Facebook Suspends Christian Homeschool Mom's Account Over Posts Citing Bible on Homosexuality.
Elizabeth Johnston
A Christian
mother is accusing the social media giant Facebook of censorship after
her account was suspended over posts on what the Bible says about
homosexuality and sin.
Elizabeth Johnston, an Ohio homeschooling mother of 10 who runs the popular conservative blog "The Activist Mommy,"
told The Christian Post on Tuesday that Facebook suspended her account
earlier this month because she wrote about how Leviticus condemns
homosexuality as "detestable" and an "abomination."
Johnston said
the comment in question was posted over six months ago in a long thread
of comments that was in response to another Facebook user who claimed
that Christians are hypocrites for condemning homosexuality but being
willing to eat shellfish and pork.
The post was removed on Feb. 9 and Johnston's public "The Activist Mommy" Facebook page,
which has over 76,000 followers, was frozen for a period of three days.
She was alerted that her comment on homosexuality was removed because
"it doesn't follow the Facebook Community Standards."
"Someone had
commented underneath one of my videos and were commenting under the
thread and said something about how Old Testament law prohibits the
eating of pork — one of the homosexuals' favorite arguments to make. I
responded with just scriptural commentary and that is considered 'hate
speech' by Facebook," Johnston explained. "It was just very intellectual
and it was just a commentary on what the Bible says. There was no name
calling or anything like that."
After her account was unfrozen on
Feb. 12, Johnston said that she re-posted her thoughts on the Bible's
condemnation of homosexuality only to have Facebook remove the post
again and freeze her account for an additional seven days.
"Last
Sunday, I posted something about the ban, explaining to my followers
where I had been the last three days and reposted the screenshot and
wrote #FacebookCensorship," Johnston said. "That pissed them off and
they didn't like that at all. It was going viral. Just within a few
hours, they had banned me again and they were going to make it more
painful."
The widely used social media platform was surrounded in controversy last year after it was accused of censoring conservative news sites in
its "trending news" section. At the time, Zuckerberg denied the
allegations that Facebook suppresses conservative media outlets and
assured that Facebook is "committed to building a platform for all
ideas."
Zuckerberg later had a meeting with conservative media
figures to hear their concerns and build trust. He assured that Facebook
is a "platform for all ideas."
Facebook has yet to provide a
concrete reason as for why Johnston's posts were removed and her account
was suspended. But the organization's community standards explain that
Facebook removes various forms of "hate speech" — a term LGBT activists
have used to label traditional biblical teachings on homosexuality. (Screengrab: Facebook/The Activist Mommy)The community standards state:
"Facebook removes hate speech, which includes content that directly
attacks people based on their: race, ethnicity, national origin,
religious affiliation, sexual orientation, sex, gender, or gender
identity, or serious disabilities or diseases."
Johnston's post only cited Scripture and did not directly attack any person.
The
Ohio mother contended that with the way the Facebook algorithm is set
up is that all that is needed for her account to be frozen is for
liberal trolls and LGBT activists to report her account.
Johnston,
who launched her "Activist Mommy" blog in 2016, told CP that she had
been active on Facebook for over 10 years and was never reported until
she became "The Activist Mommy." Since then, she has had her account
frozen three different times. The first time coming last year after LGBT
activists complained about a video she posted of a local gay pride
parade.
"The fact of it is that the people who have more
influence and a following as conservative Christians and have a larger
voice in the culture are at greater risk for this type of thing
happening," she stated. "We can be innocent as a baby but if a
homosexual goes onto a website and tells everybody to report 'The
Activist Mommy,' then I end up getting banned."
"It would
be one thing if Facebook said, 'We're liberals. This is our page and we
can do whatever we want. It's our property.' I would appreciate that at
least they were being honest and transparent," she added. "But no, they
lie and say 'we're unbiased.' But when Christians report nudity or
pictures of Donald Trump assassinated with a bullet through his head, we
get responses that say, 'This does not violate Facebook's community
guidelines' and the post remains.'"
The Christian Post reached out
to Facebook for comment on why Johnston's posts were removed and
whether or not the platform allows its users to debate issues of
homosexuality. No response was received by press time.
This is not the first time that Facebook has tried to censor somebody who posted about their opposition to the LGBT movement.
Last
April after the controversy surrounding North Carolina's transgender
bathroom bill became a national issue, Kristi Merritt of Lakewood,
Washington, posted a series of photos on Facebook with the purpose of showing the flawed logic behind the Left's push for transgender rights.
Merritt
dressed up in a series of outfits to prove her point that no matter
what clothes somebody puts on, they are still the same biological sex
they were when they were born.
One picture shows Merritt dressed
up in a sombrero while she holds a Corona and a sign that reads, "Does
this make me a Mexican?" Another photo shows Merritt dressed up like a
pirate with a sign that reads, "Does this make me a pirate?" A third
photo shows Merritt wearing a Russell Wilson Seattle Seahawks jersey
while holding a sign that asks, "Does this make me Russell Wilson?" A
fourth photo features a dress, purse and high-heel shoes laid out next
to a sign that asks, "Then, how can this make a man into a woman?"
"A man in women's clothes does not make him a woman," Merritt wrote. "Men should not get to be in our bathrooms or lockers!"
In an update post,
Merritt wrote that Facebook tried to get her to remove the pictures
because they had been flagged for nudity even though she was fully
clothed in all of the pictures. Merritt was told that in order to keep
her account activated, she must remove the posts tagged for nudity.
"Facebook
is trying to make me remove this post, they are saying it has nudity in
it. Here's what's happening. The people who want to censor me are
reporting it as having nudity when clearly it does not," she said. "THIS
IS HOW THE LEFTIST HATERS function, only they have free speech!!!!"
No comments:
Post a Comment