Over
the past decade, Christians in the United States have grown
increasingly alarmed about the persecution of other Christians overseas,
especially in the Middle East. With each priest kidnapped in Syria,
each Christian family attacked in Iraq or each Coptic church bombed in
Egypt, the clamor for action rose.
During the campaign, Donal trump
picked up on these fears, speaking frequently of Christians who were
refused entry to the United States and beheaded by terrorists of the
Islamic State: “If you’re a Christian, you have no chance,” he said in
Ohio in November.
Now, President Trump has followed through on his campaign promise to rescue Christians who are suffering.
The executive order
he signed on Friday gives preference to refugees who belong to a
religious minority in their country, and have been persecuted for their
religion.
The
president detailed his intentions during an interview with the
Christian Broadcasting Network on Friday, saying his administration is
giving priority to Christians because they had suffered “more so” than
others, “so we are going to help them.”
But
if Mr. Trump had hoped for Christian leaders to break out in cheers,
that is, for the most part, not what he has heard so far.
A
broad array of clergy members has strongly denounced Mr. Trump’s order
as discriminatory, misguided and inhumane. Outrage has also come from
some of the evangelical, Roman Catholic and mainline Protestant leaders
who represent the churches most active in trying to aid persecuted
Christians.
By
giving preference to Christians over Muslims, religious leaders have
said the executive order pits one faith against another. By barring any
refugees from entering the United States for nearly four months, it
leaves people to suffer longer in camps, and prevents families from
reuniting.
Also,
many religious leaders have said that putting an indefinite freeze on
refugees from Syria, and cutting the total number of refugees admitted
this year by 60,000, shuts the door to those most in need.
“We
believe in assisting all, regardless of their religious beliefs,” said
Bishop Joe S. Vásquez, the chairman of the committee on migration for
the
Jen Smyers, the director of policy and advocacy for the immigration and refugee program of a ministry affiliated with dozens of Christian denominations, called Friday a “shameful day” in United States history.
It remains to be seen whether Mr. Trump’s executive order will find more support in the pews.
During
the campaign, Mr. Trump successfully mined many voters’ concern about
national security and fear of Muslims. He earned the votes of four out
of every five white evangelical Christians, and a majority of white
Catholics showed.
In
interviews on Sunday, churchgoers in several cities were sharply
divided on the issue, including on whether Christian teachings supported
giving priority to Christians.
“Love
thy neighbor” was cited more than once, and by both sides: It was seen
as both a commandment to embrace all peoples and to defend one’s actual
neighbors from harm.
“You
look at a city like Mosul, which is one of the oldest Christian
populations in the world,” said Mark Tanner, 52, a worshiper at Buckhead
Church, an evangelical church in Atlanta, referring to the besieged
Iraqi city. “There’s a remnant there that want to stay there to be a
Christian witness.”
“So
yeah,” he continued. “We should reach out to everyone, but we have to
be real about it and as far as who you let come into the country.”
Nmachi
Abengowe, 62, a native of Nigeria who attends Oak Cliff Bible
Fellowship in Dallas, cited Muslim-on-Christian violence in Africa in
defending Mr. Trump’s preference for Christian refugees.
“They believe in jihad,” he said of Muslims. “They don’t have peace. Peace comes from Jesus Christ.”
That
was not the view of Makeisha Robey, 39, who was at the Atlanta church.
“I think that is just completely opposite what it means to be a
Christian,” she said. “God’s love was not for you specifically. It’s
actually for everyone, and it’s our job as Christians to kind of enforce
that on this planet, to bring God’s love to everyone.”
John
and Noreen Yarwood, who attended Mass at the Co-Cathedral of St.
Joseph, a Catholic church in Brooklyn, said they feared that a policy of
preference for Christians could in practice become a preference for
certain denominations of Christianity over others.
“What
does this administration mean by Christian?” Mr. Yarwood, 37, asked. He
said that refugees are deserving of help and mercy “because of
desperation and poverty,” not because of their religion.
“This is not grace,” he said of the president’s order. “It doesn’t follow Christian teachings.”
Christian leaders who defended Mr. Trump’s executive order were rare this weekend.
One
of the few was the Rev. Franklin Graham, the son of the evangelist
Billy Graham and the president of Samaritan’s Purse, an evangelical aid
organization.
Mr. Graham has long denounced Islam as “evil,” and in July 2015 proposed entering the United States as a solution to domestic terrorism, months before Mr. Trump made his first call for the same.
In
a statement on Saturday, Mr. Graham said of refugees, “We need to be
sure their philosophies related to freedom and liberty are in line with
ours.”
He added that those who followed a set of beliefs at the core of Islam — hold notions “ultimately incompatible with the Constitution of this nation.”
Jim
Jacobson, the president of Christian Freedom International, which
advocates for persecuted Christians, applauded the executive order and
said, “The Trump administration has given hope to persecuted Christians
that their cases will finally be considered.”
Among
the claims Mr. Trump made at his campaign rallies was that the Obama
administration had denied refugee status to Christians, and had given
preference to Muslims.
“How
unfair is that? How bad is that?” he told supporters at a rally in St.
Clairsville, Ohio, interlaced with boasts about his “tremendous
evangelical support.”
The
contention was consistent with the conspiracy theories held by some
conservative Christians that Mr. Obama was secretly a Muslim, and that
he was turning a blind eye to the suffering of Christians while using
the reins of government to increase the Muslim population of the United
States.
But
the claim is simply untrue. In 2016, the United States admitted almost
as many Christian refugees (37,521) as Muslim refugees (38,901),
according to the,
While
only about one percent of the refugees from Syria resettled in the
United States last year were Christian, the population of that country
is 93 percent Muslim and only 5 percent Christian,
And
leaders of several refugee resettlement organizations said during
interviews that it took 18 months to three years for most refugees to go
through the vetting process to get into the United States.
Many Syrian Christians got into the pipeline more recently.
“We
have no evidence that would support a belief that the Obama
administration was discriminating against Christian populations,” said
the Rev. Scott Arbeiter, the president of the humanitarian arm of National Association of Evangelicals.
His organization has resettled thousands of Muslim refugees, with the help of a network of 1,200 evangelical churches.
Mr.
Arbeiter said that World Relief is opposed to “any measure that would
discriminate against the most vulnerable people in the world based on
ethnicity, country of origin, religion, gender or gender identity. Our
commitment is to serve vulnerable people without regard to those
factors, or any others.”
He
said that World Relief had already gathered 12,000 signatures from
evangelical Christians for a petition opposing Mr. Trump’s executive
order.
“We’re
going to call out to our network, the 1,200 churches that are actively
involved,” he said, “and ask them to use their voices to change the
narrative, to challenge the facts that drive the fear so high that
people would accept this executive order.”
No comments:
Post a Comment